California Contract Interpretation Extrinsic Evidence
It will appear that the court of first instance has some discretion to rule on the admissibility of such extrinsic evidence. 5. The parist rule of proof does not preclude extrinsic evidence presented to prove that a writing was mere deception ( FPI Develop., Inc. v. Nakashima (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 367, 401). In California, […]